| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Lyng v. Castillo ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Lyng v. Castillo
''Lyng v. Castillo'', 477 U.S. 635 (1986), reversed a lower court's decision that the change in the statutory definition of a household violated the appellee's due process rights. The program rules for food stamps were changed in 1981 and 1982 which changed the definitions of households. The Supreme Court ruled that the District court erred in using heightened scrutiny to analyze the validity of the household definition.
Earlier, the Supreme Court ruled in ''Department of Agriculture v. Moreno'', 413 U.S. 528, that the Food Stamp Act of 1971 had an unconstitutional definition of household which would reduce or eliminate benefits if an unrelated individual lived in the household.
== Background of case ==
Eligibility for the federal food stamp program is determined on a “household” basis. However, the exact definition of the term "household" fluctuates and may not include all people living on the same property. Those that are not figured into the discussion include distant family members (farther than first cousin) tenants or sub leasers, non-legally related minors and non-married spouses. The plaintiffs argued that these groups or some of them should be included in proposals for eligibility and quantity of aid supplied.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Lyng v. Castillo」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|